Legend of the Five Rings Wiki
Frisk (talk | contribs)
(Reply with my opinion)
(reply, there is a difference between editing existing pages and creating new ones)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
A spam article has just been created and deleted, and I have been thinking maybe we should require a login to create new pages.--[[User:Xanthipos|Xanthipos]] ([[User talk:Xanthipos|talk]]) 13:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 
A spam article has just been created and deleted, and I have been thinking maybe we should require a login to create new pages.--[[User:Xanthipos|Xanthipos]] ([[User talk:Xanthipos|talk]]) 13:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 
:Hey, I've been the one who deleted the spam article using [[gphelp:GRASP|GRASP]] mandate. The deleted page was a part of spam wave on Gamepedia we are currently dealing with internally. While locking the wiki out of the IP edits is possible, Gamepedia staff (which I'm not part of) and I greatly discourage from taking such a step. Spam and vandalism happens from time to time however it is usually easy to deal with. The IP contributions are often very helpful and allowing users without an account to edit the wiki is probably a better idea, especially in smaller communities. <br>Best, [[User:Frisk|Frisk]] ([[User talk:Frisk|talk]]) 14:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 
:Hey, I've been the one who deleted the spam article using [[gphelp:GRASP|GRASP]] mandate. The deleted page was a part of spam wave on Gamepedia we are currently dealing with internally. While locking the wiki out of the IP edits is possible, Gamepedia staff (which I'm not part of) and I greatly discourage from taking such a step. Spam and vandalism happens from time to time however it is usually easy to deal with. The IP contributions are often very helpful and allowing users without an account to edit the wiki is probably a better idea, especially in smaller communities. <br>Best, [[User:Frisk|Frisk]] ([[User talk:Frisk|talk]]) 14:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
  +
::Just because allowing a user without an account to edit a wiki is a better idea doesn't mean allowing them to create new pages is.--[[User:Xanthipos|Xanthipos]] ([[User talk:Xanthipos|talk]]) 14:33, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:33, 19 February 2019

A spam article has just been created and deleted, and I have been thinking maybe we should require a login to create new pages.--Xanthipos (talk) 13:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Hey, I've been the one who deleted the spam article using GRASP mandate. The deleted page was a part of spam wave on Gamepedia we are currently dealing with internally. While locking the wiki out of the IP edits is possible, Gamepedia staff (which I'm not part of) and I greatly discourage from taking such a step. Spam and vandalism happens from time to time however it is usually easy to deal with. The IP contributions are often very helpful and allowing users without an account to edit the wiki is probably a better idea, especially in smaller communities.
Best, Frisk (talk) 14:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Just because allowing a user without an account to edit a wiki is a better idea doesn't mean allowing them to create new pages is.--Xanthipos (talk) 14:33, 19 February 2019 (UTC)