As part of the Unified Community Platform project, your wiki will be migrated to the new platform in the next few weeks. Read more here.

Talk:Brash Samurai

From Legend of the Five Rings Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

The ID seems a bit confusing to me. Looking at the card image, it looks like it is 46. Obviously that number conflicts with Nerishma... However, the numbering seems to be in the 'modern' style, with a 'D' preceeding the ID number. Any thoughts? Barrufet80 (talk) 08:55, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

I don't remember where I got the card from, but it looks like the lower part was photo-shopped in. This is definitely a card where we need a better picture from. - Yanderesliver (talk) 09:16, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
The current image is most certainly a fake, I have not seen it fro any official or just semi-official source. The ID is wrong, as is the illustraor, I don'T know why we even have such a fake in the wiki... - Drudenfusz (talk) 09:49, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
It was the highest quality image I found on the internet. I mean we can revert is to an earlier version. - Yanderesliver (talk) 10:52, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
There is no earlier version. The card is just seen on showcase lying on a table in rather bad quality, and the artfork from the artist is available. So, someone must have zoomed into the showcase image, guessed what the text might be, took Nerishima, photoshoped the artwork from the artist into it and put the text there. Which I think could actual be accurate. Personally, I think I would like the image to be removed from the wiki, but if you think we should keep until we get an official card, then we can keep it. - Drudenfusz (talk) 11:01, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
No need to remove it from my point of view. Just upload a new image once a newer/more accurate one get's available. We had a few cases were the image was faulty especially when it came from the first article. This will sort itself out with time. - Yanderesliver (talk) 12:05, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
I found a version which is low quality but not photoshoped. So that should work until we get something better. - Yanderesliver (talk) 19:19, 26 May 2017 (UTC)